I've heard it in Paris! Sent from my iPhone
On 2 Nov 2011, at 20:02, f5obv <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think the hum is coming from gas pipes, I've heard the hum in > mountainous areas very far from any possible gas pipes, what I've > noticed however : > -It definitely does not come from my body > -It exists outside and propagates in the air like any other sound > -Its propagation is affected by areas of low and high pressures > -It can stop altogether when the wind here comes from the south and > when an area of high pressure is blocked on my region > -I live in Pau in SouthWest France and the source of the hum is west > or sligthly south west from here. > -I've never heard it on the Altantic beaches so far > -There are places where I often go and I've never heard it there (I've > never heard it in Paris). > -The pitch sometimes seems in synch with the electric motors around my > house when I switch them on and sometimes the pitch of the hum adds > and resonates with it, so the electric grid could influence the pitch > of the hum. > Have you noticed the same type of things in the areas where you live? > Let's check our experiences! > All the best from the sunny Pyrenees. > JM > > On 29 oct, 13:23, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: >> Not electrical - this tallies with the Faraday cage reports of non >> cessation- but ONLY Gas pipes? >> Presumably, if this is so, then people miles out at sea or in an >> aircraft will not get hum? >> Background noise can be high in these environments -so only a bad >> sufferer would tell. >> If the hum is all gas pipelines extending 50 miles out it doesn't >> leave room for much else. >> Unlikely too, to get all the pressure pumps switched off as this would >> shut down every country.. >> Some hum reports are out in the wilds, where pipelines don't exist - >> but they are events hard to dig out, like the people 'under way' as >> above. >> >> On Oct 28, 2:31 am, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I wish I could share all the data, testing and work gone into proving >>> out the gas lines are causing the HUM in the western part of CT and >>> within a hundred miles of here. It comprises of FFT, Spectragraphs, >>> regional acoustic mapping, data from reprots of 2 consultants hired to >>> sway us away from electrical power line and gas compressor sources >>> (it's not electrical!). Mapping around the country vs the US NG grid >>> with 99 % accuracy of hum locations in the proximity of these lines >>> are very conclusive. You might want to check the latest map filed in >>> the yahoo hum forum files section. At any rate, the next steps which >>> are really getting resistance, is to get the info into the local news, >>> gather support and push the politicans who are afraid to let this be >>> expsoed into taking action by an investigation. As john dawes >>> mentions, many obstacles to clear investigation get in teh way. >>> Obviously there are non supporters of this hypotheis, but I haven't >>> seen one iota of good research work to dispute it. >> >>> The way this will come to a head is putting this in teh way of >>> expansion, and convincing open minded people what harm this is casuing >>> to us and teh ecossytem. Constant bombradment of ILFN causing seishe >>> waves in pools here certainly is not good.... >> >>> On Oct 2, 6:20 pm, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> The conveyance of the sound waves through the ground are not audible >>>> until some mechanism of reasonance is encountered. At that time the >>>> sound waves (ILFN) become noise to those able to hear the lower >>>> frequencies. More people actually sense a pressure of the ears, or if >>>> intense enough breathing, nausea distress. Tested this out 15 feet >>>> below grade the other day in an office building storage area that is >>>> 0.95 miles from 2 misbehaving gas lines (36 and 30 inch). Human >>>> perception of this stuff varies greatly. >> >>>> On Sep 7, 7:22 am, Trev <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>> The problem is this- Is Hum noise, or NOT? >>>>> If it's noise [technically] this means there's no info in it, either >>>>> way. >>>>> I think the fact it could be 'other than' noise is an added dimension >>>>> and worries people. >>>>> If Hum can be construed as a controlling or info gathering technique >>>>> then it becomes much more 'dark'. >> >>>>> Now- here's the problem- if it's industrial pollution, AS WELL as a >>>>> background pickup of secret technology[ies]- & then are merged by the >>>>> ubiquitous nature of the human ear, as coupled to the central nervous >>>>> system and brain. >>>>> Both these sources will be blanked by their respective generators, for >>>>> fear of disclosure- and while they are merged on receipt, no one can >>>>> untangle the process[es] in order to present a case. >>>>> The main drift [under this scenario] of the forum is to provide a open >>>>> haven where experiences can be discussed and support given, where >>>>> possible. >>>>> This is not a lame response, just practical -under these >>>>> circumstances. >>>>> Probably, almost everyone who has posted here has a fair point to >>>>> make- and it's a 'good thing' that the net affords instant and varied >>>>> feedback on this and many other difficult subjects. >> >>>>> On Sep 7, 12:16 am, Steve K <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>> Heres the problem. As expereinced by Will - extreme frustration. >>>>>> Whatever everyones tested or surmised postions are, the entire >>>>>> complaint process (or lack of of) is so fragmented, no one will ever >>>>>> get critical mass to get the influeneced politicans to investigate >>>>>> this crap. Do you realize there are tens of thousands of this problem >>>>>> around a dozen or so industrialized countries. >> >>>>>> As far as getting tedious, accepted, especially after two years of >>>>>> intense work. This pipeline thing is not by desire, it is a fallout of >>>>>> fortunate circumstance for us explainaing a revelation of the years of >>>>>> no one being able to explain this. This pipline thing is so complex, I >>>>>> can understand the lack of buy in, that's teh problem with this type >>>>>> media. No problem. Anyhow, nothing stopping this train until real >>>>>> research either proves or disproves this. In the meantime, I am sure >>>>>> there are many other causes, and if all studied like we have done >>>>>> here, maybe we'll get answers. >> >>>>>> On Aug 16, 9:28 am, dboots <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>> hmmm most likely by now their is giving the high number of research >>>>>>> programs that have gone into creating software and hardware to mimic >>>>>>> the human ear their has to be some recording devices of microphones >>>>>>> that likely have a capacity to pick up the lower ELF or some of the >>>>>>> higher VHF similiar to how our ears would percieve frequencys and >>>>>>> convert that into vibrations. They didn't get to start designing >>>>>>> brain models without figuring out how our sensory pathways take what >>>>>>> it senses and convert it into cell signaling data that makes it way to >>>>>>> the brain >> >>>>>>> The ears are a unique piece of the brains learning process's as >>>>>>> they are so uniquely tied in to bone conduction too. The ears hear >>>>>>> what is happening outside our bodies as well as hearing some of the >>>>>>> blood that flows thru our bodies. >> >>>>>>> I have been hearing their is a new advanced mircophone on the market >>>>>>> (perhaps someone can rent it because it costs about $35,000 brand >>>>>>> new) The hum seems to interfere with our memory pathways too, so I am >>>>>>> sorry the name of this brand of microphone is alluding me at the >>>>>>> moment >> >>>>>>> Well I don't think that after all these years it is not as >>>>>>> classified as we think. I think if proof can be obtained, and >>>>>>> repeated by others, their is a likeyhood it will be published. This >>>>>>> is one of those conspiracy theory's that they don't seem to mind as >>>>>>> much about of the media doing stories on it, >> >>>>>>> I understand your position about hypothesis. Not too many of them >>>>>>> seem solid to my common sense either. They might be pieces of the >>>>>>> bigger picture but they are not the main culprit is my opinon. And >>>>>>> so many want it to be something normal of our everyday lifes rather >>>>>>> than going outside the box to seek answers. >> >>>>>>> Hang in their. Their is no easy path for us to go forward on. >>>>>>> Our data is limited and we are stuck with our own common sense trying >>>>>>> to figure it out as we go along. >> >>>>>>> But I have to agree with Steve, being disrespectful won't get you >>>>>>> anyplace. Disrepect seems also to be a tool of the trade of trolls. >> >>>>>>> take care >>>>>>> Dee >> >>>>>>> On Aug 6, 1:56 am, Will Godson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> I wrote to Rosmary at the LFNSA. She wrote me back a very nice letter >>>>>>>> but in it she states she does not hear the hum. So much for that line >>>>>>>> of enquiry. As for the other pointers 1. There is not a microphone >>>>>>>> invented that is as good as the human ear. 2. It's obvious who are the >>>>>>>> genuine hearers and who are trolls. 3. Since we are dealing with >>>>>>>> something classified top secret no one will be allowed to publish >>>>>>>> anything which even hints at the truth.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >>>> - Show quoted text - > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Hum Sufferers" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hum Sufferers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hum-sufferers?hl=en.
