Merci beaucoup!
BTW, it seems that lstopo does not print indexes when the value is
HWLOC_UNKNOWN_INDEX
$ lstopo --physical --allow all
Machine (31GB total)
Package
NUMANode P#0 (26GB)
L3 (4096KB) + Core P#0
L2 (1024KB) + L1d (32KB) + L1i (48KB)
Die + PU P#0
PU P#2
PU P#4
PU P#6
L2 (1024KB) + L1d (32KB) + L1i (48KB)
PU P#1
PU P#3
PU P#5
PU P#7
Group0
NUMANode P#3 (5354MB)
Block(Disk) "sda"
Net "env2"
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 2:33 PM Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote:
> Le 26/05/2021 à 14:24, Jirka Hladky a écrit :
>
>
> However maybe debugging would be easier if tools printed that special
>> value as -1 instead of 4294967295 (I'd need to check other tools too,
>> lstopo takes care of some of these values, maybe not all).
>
> I agree. So perhaps we can update to tools only, to print 4294967295 as
> -1?
>
>
> Opened as https://github.com/open-mpi/hwloc/issues/468
>
> Hopefully we'll get some time to fix this before releasing 2.5.
>
> Brice
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hwloc-devel mailing list
> hwloc-devel@lists.open-mpi.org
> https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-devel
--
-Jirka
_______________________________________________
hwloc-devel mailing list
hwloc-devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://lists.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo/hwloc-devel
