Hi Brice, this sounds perfectly reasonable to me. I will make the arrangements on packing side.
Perhaps you could add this in README file? Thanks Jirka On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote: > Le 08/10/2014 01:52, Jiri Hladky a écrit : > > Hi Brice, > > > > glad to see the new version is out! :-) > > > > I have bumped into couple of minor problems when building new RPM for > > Fedora: > > > > 1) desktop file > > desktop-file-validate hwloc-ls.desktop.back > > hwloc-ls.desktop.back: error: file contains key "comment" in group > > "Desktop Entry", but keys extending the format should start with "X-" > > hwloc-ls.desktop.back: warning: value "Application;System;" for key > > "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" contains a deprecated value > > "Application" > > > > Fixed version is attached. > > > > I am fixing this, thanks. > > Here's the plan: > * rename the desktop file to lstopo.desktop and make it point to lstopo. > The change is invisible when clicking in the menu. > * only install lstopo.desktop when lstopo is graphical (Cairo/X11 > support). Otherwise the menu entry doesn't work (no terminal) > > which means: > * if building without cairo/X11 support, lstopo and lstopo.1 are > symlinks. Packagers can choose to ignore lstopo and lstopo.1. > lstopo.desktop isn't installed. > * if building with cairo/X11 support, lstopo is a graphical binary, > lstopo.1 is a symlink, lstopo.desktop is installed. packagers can > distribute all of lstopo+lstopo.1+lstopo.desktop separately (like Fedora > does) > > Not sure where I should document all this. > > I am not touching hwloc-ls, it remains a possibly-suboptimal symlink for > now. > > Brice > > _______________________________________________ > hwloc-users mailing list > hwloc-us...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/hwloc-users > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/hwloc-users/2014/10/1109.php >
