Speech by the Rt. Hon. Joe Clark on the Opposition day motion on
Terrorism
(bilingual)

Notes for a speech by
the Rt. Hon. Joe Clark, P.C., C.C., M.P.,
on an Opposition day motion on Terrorism
in the House of Commons

Ottawa, Ontario
Monday, October 15, 2001 

Just five weeks ago, we Canadians lived in a world which felt much safer
and more secure than it does today.  The terrorist attacks of September
11 literally changed our lives forever. 

Ces attaques se sont produites en sol américain, mais elles ont entraîné
la mort de canadiens et canadiennes.  Ces assauts contre la liberté et
l’ordre, valeurs auxquelles adhèrent les canadiens, ont mis fin à un
sentiment illusoire d’invulnérabilité qui était peut?être plus ancré ici
que chez notre superpuissant voisin.  Cette attaque était donc dirigée
également contre nous, contre ce que nous sommes et ce en quoi nous
croyons.  Il est de notre devoir de réagir, non par esprit de vengeance,
mais dans le but de protéger nos communautés, de réconforter et d’aider
nos amis pour qui tout sentiment de sécurité a volé en éclats et de tout
faire pour empêcher la répétition de tels actes terroristes.

Those attacks were on American soil.  But they took Canadian lives.
They were targeted at Canadian values of freedom and order.  And they
have ended an illusion of invulnerability that might have been stronger
here than in the superpower next door.  So this was an attack on us too.
They were attacks on who we are, and what we believe.  And we have a
duty to respond, not in vengeance, but to protect the communities where
we live, to offer comfort and help to friends whose own sense of
security has been torn asunder, and to take every reasonable step to
prevent these terrorists from succeeding again.

I commend the Canadian government for now playing a more active role,
including a military role, in the common front and common fight against
terrorism.

This motion has three purposes. First, we will vote today to reaffirm
our condemnation of this terrorist attack.

Second, we will vote to affirm our support of the courageous men and
women of the Canadian Armed Forces who will be joining the international
military coalition to fight terrorism, and defend free and orderly
societies.

Third, we will vote to order the Standing Committees on Foreign Affairs
and International Trade, and National Defence and Veterans Affairs, to
meet jointly and frequently to hear and examine ministers and officials
of the government. 

September eleventh is a turning point in all our lives. 

The cruel losses, the grotesque images, the fear, the anger, the
sleeplessness, the helplessness, the look in the faces of children who
comprehend this anxiety better than we may think, and wonder when their
lives can be normal again.

This is Canada today. It is a country alert to a profound threat,
consumed by an unaccustomed fear and sadness. This is a country that
doesn’t often ask for leadership, but wants leadership now.

All of us in this House share responsibility for that leadership. 

That is leadership in the short term - in playing Canada’s full and
unequivocal part in the common front against terrorism. And leadership
in the longer term - in ensuring that Canada has the military strength
to meet our responsibilities - in ensuring that our intelligence
services are strong enough, in concert with our allies, to not be taken
by surprise again - and in assuming again Canada’s leading role in
international development. 

As my colleague from Saint John will argue, we have let our military
capacity run down dangerously. And now we are paying a price. 

Mr. Speaker, if public opinion is against military spending, we need to
change public opinion. In my view, working for peace, but planning to
fight when necessary is decidedly better than planning for peace, and
hoping that others will defend us. If the United States had shirked
their military responsibilities the way we have tiptoed around ours, no
one wants to imagine what kind of situation we would be facing today.

But let us be clear about our immediate obligation. It is to find, and
fight, and seek to stop, the September 11th terrorists. 

The country, Afghanistan, is not the target here. 

Certainly, the ravaged people of Afghanistan are not the target - that
is why military strikes and humanitarian aid are being sent
simultaneously. The target is the terrorists whom the Taliban regime
cultivate and protect.

The purpose is to cause the Taliban to surrender the terrorists. The
first attempts were diplomatic. That is why the coalition was so
carefully built. That is why Prime minister Blair was in Pakistan,
playing the last diplomatic card. 

We all knew that the only argument that might persuade the Taliban was
the threat of force. And you do not threaten force unless you intend to
use it.

>From the public statements of Al-Quaeda we can only assume that the
terrorists plan future attacks, perhaps again against the men and women
and children who live in North America.  The government of Canada would
know, because it has access to intelligence assessments of this
question, assessments which the prime minister has refused to share with
this house or with Canadians.  But other governments have been more open
with their assessments of the threat we face, and they believe it is
real.

I have always argued that one of the distinguishing assets of Canada in
world affairs is a moral authority.  And if we have a moral authority,
we must use it or lose it. 

In these circumstances, our language and our actions must be strong,
clear, unequivocal. 

There is no moral justification for the statements and actions of the
Al-Quaeda network and Osama bin Laden. 

I have been to refugee camps, in the Middle East, and in Peshawar.  And
I have been to ground zero in New York.  The horror of one does not
justify the horror of the other.

No serious student of the modern world would dispute that poverty and
desperation and envy are spawning grounds of terrorism. 

And there can be no doubt at all that Canada and other democracies have
let our commitment to international development and justice falter.  And
that commitment must be renewed, in the interest of populations who
suffer, and in our own interest.

But let us not confuse the conditions which spawn terrorism with the
cynical, calculated, cold-blooded and deadly determination of an Osama
bin Laden to exploit those conditions. 

These terrorists are professional, well-trained, well-funded killers.
And if you ask who they are, that is clear.  They are terrorists.
Spreading fear and terror is their motivation.  Terrorism is their
religion, their only real religion. 

On September eleventh, Osama bin Laden and his followers killed Muslims,
Christians, and Jews, men, women, children.  He killed rich people and
poor people. 

He asked for nothing, made no demands, put forward no agenda, accepted
no responsibility.  He -- and the killers he recruited and shaped --
deserve scorn, not understanding. 

No one in this House, or in this country, should confuse the conditions
which might nurture terrorism with the cold-blooded criminal intent to
exploit those conditions. 

Of course the world must address those conditions of poverty and
desperation.  But the urgent task now is to catch and stop the
criminals, whose weapon is reckless terror.  That is why it is right and
necessary for Canada to play a full and active military role now. 

This motion also calls upon the government to keep Parliament and
Canadians informed about this crisis in the same way that Parliament and
Canadians were informed during the Gulf war. 

We propose the same procedure that members of the government argued for,
and used constructively, during that crisis.

At other times, I will argue that the government has a general
obligation to inform and involve Canadians.  What I want to argue today
is that informing and involving Canadians is an opportunity to enlarge
the contribution this country and its citizens can make to the campaign
against terrorism.

Parliamentarians, and private citizens, who have to plan responses to
these attacks, need the most basic information about the government’s
analysis of the threat. 

I understand fully the need for confidentiality on sensitive matters.
Sir, my diplomats moved hostages out of Iran.  I briefed this House, and
its Committees, fully, during the Gulf war.  What is at issue here is
not a matter of national security.  It is about the practical value of
facts - the advantage of information in helping to mobilize, and to
reassure, a free society. 

The reassurance is important.  Ordinary Canadians are more concerned
about their safety, and their children’s safety, than they have been in
decades.  Each new report of anthrax, or of crop-dusters, or of Osama
bin Laden’s latest threats, increases that anxiety.

Ignorance feeds fear.  Secrecy feeds fear.  Facts fight fear.  One
reason to tell Canadians the truth is that it will help offset the
worries that secrecy inspires.

But another powerful reason is that getting the facts out will help
mobilize the information and the insights of Canadians outside
government, who know things the government does not know.  All Canadians
want to help.  Some Canadians might know things, they might have heard
things that could be useful to the government. Information is key to
fighting this type of sophisticated terrorism.

Osama bin Laden did not plan his attacks on a computer, nor communicate
by internet.  These plots began, quite literally, in some obscure corner
of a world which most Canadians do not know.  And our security services
do not know them well enough.  They have not kept up to date, in Canada
or among our allies.

En revanche, il y a des canadiens et canadiennes qui travaillent dans
ces coins du globe et qui connaissent la langue, la culture et les
angoisses des habitants. À cette fin, le gouvernement devrait d’abord
accepter de partager davantage l’information qu’il détient avec le
parlement et les canadiens et canadiennes.

Monsieur le président, nous voulons tous dire aux canadiens que nous
sortirons bientôt de cette période de colère, de chagrin et de peur.
Nous voulons leur dire que le Canada n’est pas directement menacé. Nous
voulons leur dire que le reste du monde nous protégera de tout danger.
Mais ces assurances ne seraient ni vraies, ni sûres. 

Ce qui est certain c’est qu’il nous faut apporter des changements à
notre vie publique et à notre vie politique.  Nous, les politiciens,
devons être plus vigilants.  Nous devons mettre à l’épreuve le statu
quo.  Nous devons façonner l’opinion publique plutôt que d’essayer de
nous la mettre à dos.

But there are other Canadians who work in those corners of the world,
and know their languages and cultures and anxieties.  We should mobilize
their knowledge, and the way for the government to start is to share
more of what it knows, with Parliament and with Canadians.

Mr. Speaker, we would all like to say to Canadians that we will soon
emerge from this period of anger, sorrow and fear.  We would like to
tell them that Canada faces no direct threat, or that the rest of the
world will protect us from harm.  But none of that is true or certain. 

What is certain is that our public life, our political life must change.
We in politics must be more vigilant, must challenge the status quo,
must shape opinion rather than simply trying not to run afoul of it. 

We must present a more coherent view of the world and Canada’s role in
it.  We must build support for our views, argue strenuously against
views we think are wrong headed.  We must defend the Islamic faith
against prejudice and attack, and recognize that its worst enemy right
now is the Al-Queda network.

And in a time when that country has the courage to lead, we must stand
beside the United States of America, support her people, work with her
government, share her risks, and join in the responsibility to limit the
suffering of the innocent Afghani people.

To do less, or to do differently, at this moment in time, would be to
dishonor the tradition of Canada with which we have been entrusted.

THE END

==^================================================================
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?bUrHhl.bVKZIr
Or send an email To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================

Reply via email to