On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 15:40 +0200, Sebastian Moors wrote: > Hi, > > Comix wrote: > > I introduced Sconstruct mainly to help the macosx port, but the > > Sconstruct script still needs some adjustments (like the destdir..). > > I will prefer to switch to Scons completely and remove the old and > > clumsy, but working, Makefiles. > > > > What the other developers think about that? > > I'm prefering scons too (more flexible and easier to customize), but i > had some problems with scons... It seems that scons rebuilds sometimes > the whole project, even if just one header/source file was changed. This > might be ok for end-users, but its a real pain for developers :)
I don't recall running into this myself, but a few times I had to trigger a full rebuild because I was getting link errors. Like scons missed a dependency and did not recompile some object. Only happens in the gui code, so maybe it is related to the QT pre-processing. I still prefer scons. Much easier to use and understand than the autotools framework. > The destdir option should be easy to implement, i can add it tonight (or > maybe tomorrow :) ). That would be cool! I want to start building packages of svn snapshots to make it easier for users to test. So far destdir is hanging me up. It's probably really simple, but I just haven't been able get it right. -Scott ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
