hi,
Sebastian wrote:
> I'm prefering scons too (more flexible and easier to customize), but i
> had some problems with scons... It seems that scons rebuilds sometimes
> the whole project, even if just one header/source file was changed. This
> might be ok for end-users, but its a real pain for developers :)
I agree sebastian in this instance. At the moment I use "kdevelop" with the old
makefile
buildsystem and its work well known. Today I test scons together with kdevelop.
Sometimes
I get a rebuild too, but only sometimes.
Anyway I think, that it is possible, to work productive together with scons and
kdevelop.
Comix wrote:
> I will prefer to switch to Scons completely and remove the old and
> clumsy, but working, Makefiles.
yes, do this :)
wolke
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
Hydrogen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
