Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > What about switching to qmake for linux, too? (I.e. dumping scons.) Any > thoughts? > Well scons worked most of the time better for me then the configure/qmake way. scons is ( for me ) easier to configure since everything is written in python. And we need to be more flexible on linux then on windows.. Just my opinion :)
Ah, i forgot to mention that we're not using "configure" on windows/osx because everything is hardcoded in the qmake files. That's fine so far, since our goal shoud be to deliver compiled packages for win and osx, so just the packagers need to compile it. That was the point with "more flexible on linux".. - Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
