Hi Michiel,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, joost jodel wrote:
>
> What actually *is* the problem with merging the win_ports branch and the
> trunk, and have two build system co-exist? Wouldn't that save time on
> maintaining 2 branches? It looks messier, but again, if you say most
First, this isn't a "big" issue. We're just talking.
2 branches is not good, because one will become forgotten.
2 build systems is better, but still not good because one will become
forgotten.
I'm not happy with Scons because:
* It has been a trial to get Scons to work with Windows
* It has been a trial to get Scons to work with OS X
* It has been a trial to get Scons to work with Qt
* It has been a trial to get Scons to work with Debian (.deb)
* It has been a trial to get Scons to work with Fedora (.rpm)
* Scons rebuilds everything too often.
* Scons is slow for incremental builds (change one line in
hydrogen.cpp and wait a long time for it to re-search
everything and calculate dependencies).
Since we had to abandon Scons to get H2 working on Windows and Mac... I
thought we should also _consider_ abandoning scons for *nix.
Peace,
Gabriel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Hydrogen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
