Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Reading this right after draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-21, I'm
struck that there are many things defined as possible filter criteria (e.g. TCP
header fields) but are not worth recording as statistics. Does this all fall
under the "policy hit counter?"



_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to