Thank you, that looks great! On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:40 AM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > Here is the revised draft reflecting your comments: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15 > > I attach the revision letter to explain how the revision > is done by Patrick and me for your comments. > > [Review by Martin Duke and Response by Authors] starts > from page 24 in the revision letter. > > Thanks for your valuable comments and help. > > Best Regards, > Paul > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 6:00 AM Martin Duke via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Martin Duke has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-14: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Reading this right after draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-21, I'm >> struck that there are many things defined as possible filter criteria >> (e.g. TCP >> header fields) but are not worth recording as statistics. Does this all >> fall >> under the "policy hit counter?" >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I2nsf mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >> >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
