Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for working on this specification. Thanks to Kyle Rose for TSVART review and agree with him that I also haven't find any transport related issues, hence the NO objection ballot. However, I regret that QUIC is not included in the models as transport protocol. I am curious to know why doesn't "i2nsf-nsf-event" sub leaf "i2nsf-nsf-detection-voip-vocn" have a "action*" where rest of the events have actions? I am also interested to know Eric V's discuss on reusing existing YANG models. _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
