Hi Roman, In the draft of Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model ( https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-18#page-28 ), we don't have actions for those events (including i2nsf-nsf-detection-voip-vocn) any more except for i2nsf-nsf-log-dpi, but have notifications for them instead of the actions. Note that i2nsf-nsf-log-dpi is an NSF Log with an action of logging and a notification.
Therefore, there is no problem in the current draft. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 7:07 AM Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi I2NSF WG! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: iesg <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Zaheduzzaman Sarker via > > Datatracker > > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:06 AM > > To: The IESG <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > > [email protected]; [email protected] > > Subject: Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf- > > monitoring-data-model-15: (with COMMENT) > > > > Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for > > draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-15: No Objection > > > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email > > addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory > > paragraph, however.) > > > > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/ > > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/ > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > COMMENT: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > [snip] > > > I am curious to know why doesn't "i2nsf-nsf-event" sub leaf "i2nsf-nsf- > > detection-voip-vocn" have a "action*" where rest of the events have > actions? > > I wanted to follow-up on this comment. It seems that in -18, "action*" is > now dropped from all "i2nsf-nsf-event" sub leafs but "i2nsf-nsf-log-dpi". > We appear to be in a different inconsistent situation. Was this intention? > > Regards, > Roman > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
