On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong wrote:
2. I2NSF Monitoring Interface YANG Data Model
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model/
- Paul Wouters is holding Ben Kaduk's DISCUSS position, and needs to check
whether my revision satisfies Ben's DISCUSS or not.
- This draft has gotten 9 supporting ballots (Yes or No Objection).
Yes it addresses most of the DISCUSS items. I am about to change it but
I have one question left:
Section 6.7.1 had comments about firewall rule counters and properties,
and the document change just removed the listed properties. I am a
little confused how this addresses Ben's point. How do people know which
properties are defined ?
Some review comments:
The QUIC traffic should not be treated as UDP traffic
You probably mean to say "treated as generic UDP traffic". It _is_ still
UDP traffic after all.
The cookies information needs to be kept confidential and
is not RECOMMENDED to be included in the monitoring data unless
the information is absolutely necessary to help to enhance the
security of the network.
I am not sure why this header is specifically treated compared to other
HTTP headers. Please write "NOT RECOMMENDED" (eg uppercase the 'not').
This text does address Ben's DISCUSS.
3. I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface YANG Data Model
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm/
- This draft has gotten 9 supporting ballots (Yes or No Objection) and Éric
Vyncke changed his DISCUSS to ABSTAIN.
- This draft needs another review of one among the IESG ADs with No Record.
I will cast my ballot for this one later today after I've had a change
to review it.
Paul
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
