Hi Roman, I have reflected your comments on the revision of the I2NSF Capability YANG Data Model draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-31#page-72
Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 3:24 AM Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote: > Hi! > > Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model > which resolved IESG feedback. > > I'm going to ask for one more edit which will reverting a change made > based on IESG review. In the -24 /-25 which was reviewed by the IESG, > RFC8805 was correctly listed as a normative reference. IESG feedback > suggested that because this was an ISE document, referencing this document > normatively was an problem. After further discussion, in fact, RFC8805 was > appropriately called out as a DOWNREF in the IETF LC with no objection from > the community, and it is needed to fully explain the semantics of the YANG > model. > > Please move RFC8805 back to being a normative reference. > > I've advanced the document to "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised > I-D Needed". > > Again, thanks for all of the work here. > Roman > > > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > I2nsf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf