Hi Roman,
I have reflected your comments on the revision of the I2NSF Capability YANG
Data Model draft:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-31#page-72

Thanks.

Best Regards,
Paul


On Sat, May 14, 2022 at 3:24 AM Roman Danyliw <r...@cert.org> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model
> which resolved IESG feedback.
>
> I'm going to ask for one more edit which will reverting a change made
> based on IESG review.  In the -24 /-25 which was reviewed by the IESG,
> RFC8805 was correctly listed as a normative reference.  IESG feedback
> suggested that because this was an ISE document, referencing this document
> normatively was an problem.  After further discussion, in fact, RFC8805 was
> appropriately called out as a DOWNREF in the IETF LC with no objection from
> the community, and it is needed to fully explain the semantics of the YANG
> model.
>
> Please move RFC8805 back to being a normative reference.
>
> I've advanced the document to "Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised
> I-D Needed".
>
> Again, thanks for all of the work here.
> Roman
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I2nsf mailing list
> I2nsf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
>
_______________________________________________
I2nsf mailing list
I2nsf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf

Reply via email to