Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Section 3 OSPF and IS-IS are used later in the document as examples but this section (especially Figure 1) seems to treat them as more than examples. What is the actual intent? Is this draft supposed to be the canonical definition of ospf-topology and isis-topology? Please clarify. * Section 4 Is there a reason that router-id is defined as capable of having multiple instances? _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
