Suresh: On the example text, I will work with the authors to move the examples to an appendix. On the router-id, it is possible that one router can have multiple router-id - with each router-id being shared in virtual router. However, I need to go back and chat with the authors to refresh my understanding of the multiple instances. Good catch on the router-id.
Sue -----Original Message----- From: i2rs [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2017 10:16 PM To: The IESG Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [i2rs] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: (with COMMENT) Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Section 3 OSPF and IS-IS are used later in the document as examples but this section (especially Figure 1) seems to treat them as more than examples. What is the actual intent? Is this draft supposed to be the canonical definition of ospf-topology and isis-topology? Please clarify. * Section 4 Is there a reason that router-id is defined as capable of having multiple instances? _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
