2008/12/6 Luke Faraone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> To put it succinctly, actually, fedora is a distribution of GNU+Linux,
>> a free operating system. Specifically, out of GNU+Linux, the "Linux"
>> bit represents less than 1%.
>
> This is more of a religious war as well as a matter of preference; RH has
> chosen the "Linux" branding, while Debian (the only widely popular distro to
> do so) uses the "GNU/" prefix.
Yes, companies do that sort of thing with branding because of marketing.
Still question remains, are you trying to be descriptive ("this is
what you're running") or attribute credit ("these are the guys who
made what you're running")?
In either case, it could be argued "fedora" is not the optimal choice.
>
> Hm... we could have a link in the "about my XO" section that opens up a page
> in browse that describes all the components that make up the starch stack.
Sure, only I'm pretty sure this is not what RedHat had in mind.
--
Sebastian Silva
Iniciativa FuenteLibre
http://blog.sebastiansilva.com/
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
