On 06.12.2008, at 17:49, Benjamin M. Schwartz wrote: > Tomeu Vizoso wrote: >> Add Fedora logo to Sugar > > This is, I think, a misunderstanding.
Yes it is. I set reply-to to OLPC-devel, this does not concern Suagr. > Kim says "Sugar is supposed to > include a fedora logo (they will provide), on the home screen and in > the > boot up text." If you look at the "Visibility Guidelines" document > included in the bug, it contains two images, one of which shows the > Fedora > logo next to the bootup text, and one of which shows the Fedora logo > next > to the XO man in the ring. I suspect Kim's statement is based on > these > two images. > > I think Kim interpreted this to be the bootup screen and the home > screen, > but from my reading of the text, both images are meant to refer to the > pre-X bootup sequence. One is text-mode boot, and the other is pretty > boot. This is consistent with what I've understood from > conversations with > Greg and others: Fedora's branding will appear only during the boot > sequence, which is not part of Glucose at all. > > In other words: don't worry about it. This has nothing to do with > you. > > I could be wrong, of course, in which case I think we should simply > let > distributions patch as they please. It seems awfully silly for the > Debian > packages to be Fedora-branded. You are not wrong. The agreement linked to in the bug report clearly states that the Fedora branding is to be shown *during the boot process". Not after. I have added this to the bug report, but please someone more priviledged change the bug description: http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8767 - Bert - _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
