following Martin's timely advice, may I please try again, so we can finish this with simple answers?

the question is (or are)

  1. is locking users out in compliance with current GPL?
  2. does Ceibal lock out users?
  3. is there a known procedure to get keys for Ceibal users?
  4. is Ceibal in compliance with current GPL?
  5. if no, who should follow up? the FSF? the Sugarlabs Board?
  6. were of-record (2, 3) Ceibal policies to continue, would it be in
     compliance with GPL3?
  7. if no, who should follow up? the FSF? the Sugarlabs Board?

I know that 2 and 3 are almost rhetorical, but in the interest of not building other questions as "loaded", I add them there. There even might be good news I am unaware of that someone who is better informed can offer!

Thank you

Yama


On 04/23/2011 01:16 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
Folks --

one thing we need to be in good intellectual shape to handle loaded
questions. Everyone here probably knows them well, but I just re-read

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

and it was rather refreshing and useful.

In general, if you don't know much about a topic, it is a good idea to
*avoid* making inflammatory statements and accusations.

You can ask, but please don't mix the valid questions with accusations
or loaded questions. It doesn't help anyone.

cheers,


m
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep

Reply via email to