On 07.11.2011, at 14:04, Christoph Derndorfer wrote: > Hi all, > > Sascha, you make an excellent point here, I was thinking along the same lines > when I re-read the various candidate statements this morning. > > Personally I'd also be interested in taking this one step further and > creating a lively debate. Two ideas I've been thinking about are: > > (a) An IRC discussion with all the candidates next Tuesday or Wednesday > before the election starts. This would give all Sugar Labs members a chance > to directly interact with the candidates by asking questions. Additionally it > could lead to some interesting discussions among the candidates whereas I > fear that discussions here on the list will be more unidirectional (e.g. with > the candidates simply answering the questions Sascha mentions below but not > commenting on each other's answers and ideas). > (b) Organizing a Skype, Gtalk, or Google+ Hangout session with the same > purpose. While text-based communication has some advantages (e.g. it's easy > to search, reference, etc.) I personally really like hearing people's voices > and real-time reactions to discussions and arguments. > > For all these things we could use a wiki page or even something like Google > Moderator (http://moderator.appspot.com/) to collect questions from the > community in advance. > > Thoughts anyone?
Well, I for one am much more inclined to vote for those who earned my trust previously, rather than for the "winner" of an election discussion. I'm glad people are willing to serve on the board at all, since there generally is little reward, only more work and blame. Thanks to everyone who stepped up so far! Also, the mailing list has the widest reach in the community. So if you think a debate is important, do it on the list. Mail is better than chat is better than voice for general discussions. Chat and especially voice reach only a small fraction of the community, which is good for some tasks, but hardly for this. - Bert - > > Cheers, > Christoph > > Am 07.11.2011 12:21, schrieb Sascha Silbe: >> Dear SLOB candidates, >> >> I've read your announcements with interest. They all explain well >> where you're coming from and "who" you are. What I'm missing, however, >> is what you want to *do* during your election period. >> >> I'm aware that the SLOB isn't supposed to do much (and agree on this >> philosophy), but even within that framework there are possible nuances >> that could guide me as to who to vote. Right now I only see a set of >> long-term, active contributors, *each* of which I trust to have the best >> interests of Sugar Labs at heart. >> >> What do you see as current issues of Sugar Labs and what are you going >> to do to solve them? (For some issues, "staying out of the way" might be >> a valid answer). >> >> What else would you consider a good reason for me to vote you? >> >> Sascha >> > -- > Christoph Derndorfer > > editor, OLPC News [www.olpcnews.com] > volunteer, OLPC (Austria) [www.olpc.at] _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
