Were it my proposal, I would be more than happy to do so, but it is not. I think it is a matter for the proposer and the SLOB to make that publication determination. I will be creating suitable structure on the wiki for templates and yes, proposals in development, but we are still feeling our way towards what is a suitable general template.
I am sorry that you feel annoyed, that is not the intent. I will try to get the template up on the wiki as soon as possible to give you something to chew on. cjl On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > > (removed all direct emails, only using iaep list) > > Hi Chris > > On 20 April 2016 at 01:39, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I worked with Samson to refine a narrower proposal that has been >> presented to the SLOB by email. It is for the SLOB or Samson to >> decide how / when to share it with the wider community. It is for the >> >> SLOB to determine the how / when of discussing the proposal. I am >> confident that all details will be public before any decision is >> taken, I would characterize them as generally similar to previously >> funded translation work, specific terms of which have been shared >> previously. > > > Thanks for the update, and the reassurances that the final proposal will be > made public before voting. > > Partly, I feel glad that this has moved forwards :) > > But I also feel annoyed. I need connection, and transparency. I would like > to participate. > > So I request that the proposal - and all proposals to SLOB - move to the > wiki, and the discussions move the IEAP list. > > -- > Cheers > Dave > > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep