Having thought about this a bit more since this morning, I believe the best course of action would be to ask the recycler to directly donate the XO-1s to one or more projects which already accept them on a donation basis. These include the Columbus School for Girls (http://csgolpc.weebly.com/ ), Unleash Kids (www.unleashkids.org), etc.
I do not have a full list of all projects that are still active. I do not believe we would get significant new traction by trying to sell XO-1s. If we truly are going to force end of support in 2020, we should be having the developers focus on the next system and not going crazy trying to keep backwards support with the first. As long as everything is routed through 501(c)3s and we do not go too crazy, the recycler might be willing to split the pallet. If a few developers need them for testing, we could then siphon them as-needed. On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > On 13 June 2016 at 17:16, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com> wrote: > >> > >> what do you see as the difference in terms of sugar feedback? > > > > Students not using their native language, teachers at far lower level, > > daunting infrastructure difficulties which mean limited laptop time, very > > limited connectivity... believe me, the contexts will have as many > > differences as similarities > > Sure, I understand the socioeconomic contexts are different. > > How does this difference relate to getting feedback on what to work on? > _______________________________________________ > IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) > IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep >
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
