I'll look into the status of all of the outstanding motions when I get back from my current travels and make a recommendation as to what is ready for the next meeting.
-walter On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:37 AM, Sean DALY <sdaly...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net> > wrote: > >> a motion represents closure of the discussion and the continuing >> discussion >> has great value in getting us to think about out future direction and our >> obligation to our legacy. >> > > > I agree, I am concerned that the recent flurry of motions (36 so far in > 2016, although some are subsets of others) is counterproductive - there are > widely varying viewpoints concerning what SL should be doing. > > Concerning a Finance Manager, in my view the priority should be finding a > volunteer to step up. > > This is the link to passed and pending motions: > https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Decisions > > Sean. > > > _______________________________________________ > SLOBs mailing list > sl...@lists.sugarlabs.org > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/slobs > > -- Walter Bender Sugar Labs http://www.sugarlabs.org <http://www.sugarlabs.org>
_______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep