Hi, Laura
With your and Walter's opinions, may be it is time to rethink mine.
With Sebastian's techniques the software tools can be run in any
Gnome-compatible desktop. There is no need for Sugar.
SFC does not permit Sugar Labs to have labs. So without Sugar and
without labs, perhaps after this mission statement, we to consider how
to rename the project.
Tony
On 04/28/2017 11:48 AM, Laura Vargas wrote:
Dear Tony,
2017-04-27 22:37 GMT-05:00 Tony Anderson <tony_ander...@usa.net
<mailto:tony_ander...@usa.net>>:
Still amazing!
I hope you mean this in the good way! I certainly believe names of the
tools we facilitate to children should be as accurate as possible. I
partly joined Sugar Labs Community because of this basic design
principle.
What is important about Sugar Labs is Sugar and Sugarizer.
That's your opinion and it's Ok to have an opinion.
In my case my opinion is what is important about Sugar Labs is the
Community = users + supporters.
Regards and blessings to you
--
Laura V.
*I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org*
“Solo la tecnología libre nos hará libres.”
~ Laura Victoria
Happy Learning!
#LearningByDoing
#Projects4good
#IDesignATSugarLabs
#WeCanDoBetter
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
