Paul and Pablo, two questions
Do you know who is Andrew Dul?
I think it a valid question. How do you think we should respond to it?
Akinori
(2014/10/17 2:04), Andrew Dul wrote:
On 10/16/2014 9:35 AM, MAEMURA Akinori wrote:
Hi Richard,
(2014/10/17 0:38), Richard Hill wrote:
Please see below.
Thanks and best,
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: MAEMURA Akinori [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: mercredi, 15. octobre 2014 19:42
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [IANAxfer@apnic] APNIC IANA Process - Status Update
Dear Acharya,
| > I'm also curious to know whether the APNIC staff proposal
presented during
| > APNIC-38 has been accepted as the final proposal? I gather from the
| > transcripts that the APNIC staff proposal was met with
silence during the
| > conference - and that this silence was taken to be as full
consensus.
Masato as the Moderator, at the last part of the session,
took good care to study the sentiment of the floor,
which doesn't appear on the script.
It was sufficient time to wait for any last minute objection,
and quite natural to be regarded as a consensus, in my sense.
"full consensus" sounds something hard, and might be not
the case for this, but it is my understanding that we have
obtained sufficient consensus for that simple proposal,
with which we can move it forward.
Does this mean that that proposal has been approved? What about the
comments that wre made on this mailing, in particular:
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/ianaxfer/archive/2014/09/msg00003.html
It doesn't mean the proposal was approved as the final version.
But I think it is enough to move forward for further consideration.
Your message referred above is appreciated as raised an important point.
Again, the discussion in Brisbane is in the early stage, I am happy we
were successful to get the support for the simple principle with which
we can go ahead, and many details are to be discussed.
As we don't have much time, we should expedite the discussion.
What process is APNIC going to follow? How will the comments both from
the in-person meeting and the mailing list be taken into account? Who
is going to update the draft to be inclusive of those comments? When is
the next draft going to be published?
Andrew
_______________________________________________
IANAxfer mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
_______________________________________________
IANAxfer mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/ianaxfer
