+1 on wiki 

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 07:39:18 -0700, Clinton Begin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for Confluence.  I've been using it for a while, it's not perfect,
> but it's better than most.
> 
> Cheers,
> Clinton
> 
> On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:15:15 +0100, Gilles Bayon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for Wiki
> > I will voted for Confluence (there's Open Source Project License)
> >
> > If you want to restructure iBATIS.NET repository at WUSH.NET, you could do
> > it
> >
> > `-- cs/
> > | |-- branches/
> > | |-- tags/
> > | |-- trunk/
> > | |- ibatisnet1
> >
> > in the trunk directory, could you put the current source and delete
> > ibatisnet1.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 1:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Ibatisdb-developer] SVN?
> >
> > OK, I will keep whittling away at the other Incubator/Infrastructure tasks,
> > including setting up a wiki (assuming we want one), until only the repo is
> > left.
> >
> > I'll also restructure the iBATIS.NET repository at WUSH.NET, so that it's
> > ready to merge. (Gilles, chime in now if I should hold off.)
> >
> > Another alternative might be to try and combine the CVS and SVN repositories
> > at WUSH.NET and then port them to Apache. Michael Ching at WUSH.NET provides
> > outstanding service. With notice, I'm sure he'd agree to do it overnight.
> > Then, we'd just have the one repository to hand over to the (overworked)
> > Apache Infrastructure team.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:36:37 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote (on the ibatisdb
> > list):
> > > There's no ETA for this. It's low priority, as the CVS repository
> > > is publicly available now, and it works. We'll make the move to
> > > SVN at a convenient time (i.e. once some popular feature requests
> > > have settled down).
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Clinton
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:59:56 +0100, Marko Kocic
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> When is new subversion repository going to be available?
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to