+1 for Confluence. I've been using it for a while, it's not perfect, but it's better than most.
Cheers, Clinton On Tue, 14 Dec 2004 20:15:15 +0100, Gilles Bayon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for Wiki > I will voted for Confluence (there's Open Source Project License) > > If you want to restructure iBATIS.NET repository at WUSH.NET, you could do > it > > `-- cs/ > | |-- branches/ > | |-- tags/ > | |-- trunk/ > | |- ibatisnet1 > > in the trunk directory, could you put the current source and delete > ibatisnet1. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 1:38 PM > Subject: Re: [Ibatisdb-developer] SVN? > > OK, I will keep whittling away at the other Incubator/Infrastructure tasks, > including setting up a wiki (assuming we want one), until only the repo is > left. > > I'll also restructure the iBATIS.NET repository at WUSH.NET, so that it's > ready to merge. (Gilles, chime in now if I should hold off.) > > Another alternative might be to try and combine the CVS and SVN repositories > at WUSH.NET and then port them to Apache. Michael Ching at WUSH.NET provides > outstanding service. With notice, I'm sure he'd agree to do it overnight. > Then, we'd just have the one repository to hand over to the (overworked) > Apache Infrastructure team. > > -Ted. > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 09:36:37 -0700, Clinton Begin wrote (on the ibatisdb > list): > > There's no ETA for this. It's low priority, as the CVS repository > > is publicly available now, and it works. We'll make the move to > > SVN at a convenient time (i.e. once some popular feature requests > > have settled down). > > > > Cheers, > > Clinton > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 12:59:56 +0100, Marko Kocic > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> When is new subversion repository going to be available? > >
