Skip Robinson wrote:
[snip]
Let's just KISS: increase the allowable string length to 256. That should
be plenty for any well-designed application. 
[snip]

I would say 4K would be a better number. If you wanted to pass two path 
names, an input and an output for instance, that would easily use up your 
256 limit even though the parm strings themselves would be easy to read 
and understand. If someone is going to take the time, money and trouble to 
fix this, they may as well make the buffer so large that only extremely 
badly designed programs will run into the limitation. As you point out, 
abuse of the large parm string may occur, but that's shouldn't be JCLs 
concern, it should be the program designer's.

Robin Murray
Tel: (902) 453-7300 x4177
Cell: (902) 430-0637

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to