Chase, John wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
If I recall correctly, the COND= on steps in a called PROC
will take on the COND= value of the COND statement on the
EXEC card. In your case,
COND=(1,LT) will replace all of the COND=(0,LT) that exist in
the PROC in the PROCLIB.
Does this make sense?
Sure, but if the first procstep completes with, say, RC=4, why aren't the
remaining procsteps bypassed?
It's not at all clear why that should be happening.
It sounds like the COND parameter has only overriden
the first step.
But it is also not clear why you are still using COND
instead of IF in your JCL.
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
