In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/20/2005
at 02:53 PM, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>BTW: I understand and fully accept strict security rules (when
>needed), but the rules could be enforced by really effective means.
>Example: instead of firing or shooting a person who left terminal
Why don't you address what he actually wrote instead of a fantasy?
There was nothing there about shooting people for leaving a terminal
unattended. All that you do with such straw dummies is to weaken your
case.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
