> Don't you think the optimization should be in ATTACH SVC > code rather than in the initiator, so it would benefit > programmers who ATTACH IEFBR14 from programs as well as > from JCL?
First, why would a programmer do that? Second, the attaching program may expect a TCB to be created and an ECB to be posted. So, ATTACH processing would still have to do at least that much. If the initiator didn't call ATTACH, didn't issue a WAIT, etc. that would avoid more overhead. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic transmission (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its authorized recipient(s), and may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended recipient, be aware that any review, copying, printing, distribution, use or disclosure of the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please contact us immediately by electronic mail at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or notify us immediately by telephone at 1-800-345-2021 or 816-531-5575 and destroy the original and all copies of this transmission (including any attachments). Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
