Shane Ginnane wrote:

Everyone else has had their say, why not me ...

I size the PLPA to not spill. Yes I oversize it, but as Ron is fond of
pointing, what's the cost of a few extra cylinders  ???.
I pamper ASM - page-only volumes, good pathing, separate ranks. You name
it, ASM gets it.

But as far as PLPA is concerned, I tend to get *REAL* interested if the
PLPA paging rate was in any way above zero.
I'd be more than happy to waste the space on PLPA, and never have it used
after IPL.

Yes, paging rate. My rate is 0 whenever I look at the data. It seems I have more memory than I need (or just *enough*).
Do I have to pamper ASM ?
Or rather just allocate PLPA, COMMON and several LOCALs ?
Just curious.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to