Richard, The file was open before the LOAD, right? Was the concatenation a mix of PDS and PDS/Es? Or was it pure PDS (or pure PDSE)?
-- Tom Schmidt Madison, WI On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 14:41:42 -0400, Richard Verville wrote: >The jcl is correct. I caused an 0C1 dump and see in the output the concat >addresses. If I direct the load towards the steplib (I moved the libraries >there) it works fine. Richard > >Charles Mills wrote: > >> Sounds unlikely to me to be the DCB. >> >> Are you sure the JCL is correct? Are you sure the load module is there? >> <g> >> >> Perhaps someone else knows for sure: there are or were some issues with >> concatenations (for regular QSAM GET) if the subsequent concatenations >> had BLKSIZEs greater than the first. You could try coding >> BLKSIZE=<longest BLKSIZE of any library in the concatenation> on the >> first DD. >> >> Charles >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richard Verville >> >> I am attempting to LOAD a program which resides in a concatenation of a >> ddname. I coded the DCB paramater to route the load accordingly. For >> some reason, if the library is first on the concatenation it works fine, >> underwise I can a not found condition, and the same happens with the >> BLDL macro. Is this problem related to my DCB coding ? Richard ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
