>Would a reIPL function/system command be a useful thing for z/OS? Perhaps: > >V XCF,SYSNAME,sysname,OFF,REIPL > >....would do the standard VARY XCF OFF thing and then direct LPAR to reIPL >the same load parms as last time? > >Thoughts? > >Scott Fagen >z/OS Core Technology Design >IBM Poughkeepsie
What I've always disliked about V XFC,sysname,OFFLINE is that a System cannot take itself out of the Sysplex. I've always wanted a command like: V XFC,*,OFFLINE, followed by the confirmation WTOR. Then it would tell all the other systems in the Sysplex it was going away and would wait state itself. Keith E. Moe Laid Back Software, Inc. http://www.laidbacksoftware.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] (408) 749-0655 (voice and FAX) (408) 480-2067 (cell) "We take our clients seriously, not ourselves." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
