John A Pershing Jr <[email protected]> writes:
> I hesistate to jump into this discussion; however, I was "there" at the
> birth of APPC (LU-6.2/PU-2.1), and attended many meetings and task
> forces relating to the evolution of SNA.  I was a new hire into the 
> Research Division, having recently worked at BBN where I was "there" at
> the birth of the Internet (having written the first (to my knowledge) IP
> router, running on the BBN Butterfly as part of the Voice Funnel
> project).  As a (1) newbie IBMer and a (2) member of the Research
> Division, I did not have any particular agenda (e.g., in the IMS versus
> CICS wars), and was generally bemused by the political machinations that
> went on within the SNA ARB.  I remember bumping into Lynn Wheeler way
> back then (I'm talking very early '80s), although I doubt that he
> remembers me (I was one of Andy Heller's guys back then).

re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#43 SNA: conflicting opinions
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#44 SNA: conflicting opinions
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#45 SNA: conflicting opinions

as undergraduate in the 60s ... i got to do a lot of os/360 enhancements
at the univ ... i would take stage1 output and carefully re-arrange the
stage2 sysgen cards to optimally place datasets and PDS members. For
some amount of the univ. workload, I was able to obtain nearly 3-fold
thruput improvement (because of the improvement in disk arm motion).

I also got to rewrite large amounts of the cp67 kernel code ... for
pathlength optimization, dyanmic adaptive resource management, virtual
memory management and page replacement, order arm seek queuing ... and
loads of other stuff.

part of old share presentation at fall '68 share meeting ... mentioning
some of the cp67 work and the mft14 work:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/94.html#18

the univ. library then got a ONR grant to do a computerized catelogue
... and IBM selected them to be one of the betatest sites for the
original CICS product. I got tasked to support/debug that CICS
deployment.  Misc. past posts mentioning cics &/or bdam
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#bdam

More than decade later ... when Jim was departing to Tandem ... he
attempted to palm off both consulting with the IMS group ... as well as
talking to customers about relational DBMS ... some of this discussed in
past posts about system/r (original relational/sql implementation)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#systemr

some old email related to the subject:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007.html#email801006
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007.html#email801016

also mentioned in this recent post
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#41

this was in the same period that I was also starting HSDT effort
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subnetwork.html#hsdt

I originally joined the science center in cambridge ... and then
transferred to SJR in san jose. Besides getting to play in research,
they let me play in the Los Gatos VLSI lab, and DBMS stuff down
in STL, I also got to play disk engineer in bldgs. 14 & 15 ... some
past posts mentioning getting to play disk engineer
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#disk

When I became Andy's direct report ... I got to stay in san jose (even
tho carried on the books in ykt) with offices in various bldgs. in san
jose area (including almaden after the move up the hill from bldg. 28).
At the time, there were some number of people that worked on projects
Andy was backing ... but didn't actually report to him. That changed
when he became head of AWD.

One of the things I also did at the univ. for cp67 was add tty/ascii
terminal support (to the existing 2741 & 1052 terminal support). The
existing support played games with dynamically figuring out the terminal
type and used the 2702 SAD command to dynamically re-associate specific
line-scanner with specific port/line. I tried to add the tty/ascii
support in a similar dynamic manner. This all worked for
leased/hardwired lines ... but didn't quite work for dialed lines ...
since 2702 had shortcut and hardwired the linespeed/oscillator to each
port. recent thread/posts discussing some of this
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#34 August 7, 1944: today is the 65th 
Anniversary of the Birth of the  Computer
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2009l.html#42 August 7, 1944: today is the 65th 
Anniversary of the Birth of the  Computer

this was much of the motivation for the university to start its own
clone controller project; reverse engineer the channel interface, build
a clone channel interface board for interdata/3 and program the
interdata/3 to emulate the 2702 (but with additional feature that it
could dynamically determine baud rate). there was a subsequent article
blaming four of us for the clone controller business (interdata started
selling it as a product ... later sold under perkin/elmer logo when PE
bought interdata)
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#360pcm

clone controller business has been blamed as major motivation for the
future system effort
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#futuresys

as well as the convoluted nature of the pu4/pu5 interface ...  there
were lots of jokes in other product organizations, attempting to build
"SNA" complient interfaces ... that it didn't make any difference
whether it was built to a SNA specification ... the only thing that
really mattered was whether it worked with pu4/pu5.

-- 
40+yrs virtualization experience (since Jan68), online at home since Mar1970

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to