On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Bill Klein <wmkl...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> I know that ranting on IBM-MAIN is always a good way to spend your time, > but > .... > > Are you aware that the "ASM" project at SHARE accepts and processes > requirements against the Binder? If anyone who participates in SHARE needs > assistance in creating a "binder" requirement, please feel free to contact > me "off-list". > > Obviously, I can't say that IBM will respond "as you want them to" but it > does have a SLIGHTLY better chance than ranting on IBM-MAIN - in getting > the > "desired" fix to the binder. > > "William H. Blair" <wmhbl...@comcast.net> wrote in message > news:<hdemimhlcnkiedehaemecelpacac.wmhbl...@comcast.net>... > > Dave Day expressed his genuine surprise (how novel!) > > regarding the behavior of the Binder API, thusly: > <snip> > Bill K... this is a can of worms best left unopened. Suffice to say Bill Blair's commentary is not actually a rant at all, but is based entirely on his own (and my own) direct personal experience with said component. He does not need any help composing a SHARE requirement and in any case, as he indicated obliquely the chances of such a requirement being delivered within the expected lifetime of the universe is pretty slim. I have promised my friends in IBM that I won't keep picking on the binder in public every time the subject comes up, so I will just bite my tongue. You might want to as well. -- This email might be from the artist formerly known as CC (or not) You be the judge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
