From: "Gil Peleg" > Question is how will IBM regard this in terms of licensing charges?
Depends on what was signed I guess - I don't get involved at that level. One would have to think it outside the spirit of the license - especially if the CF LPAR was being actively used. > Another thing is im not totally convinced that this will not hurt > performance. Not sure PR/SM was designed to handle such a workload -- > 100%cpu 24/7... Can't see it'd be an issue - LPAR dispatcher has to determine if the guest is busy at re-dispatch anyway. The LPAR would generally run it's time-slice, be pre-empted, and wait to be re-dispatched. Rinse-spin-repeat ... Every LPAR has a guaranteed non-dispatch time, so has to be checked regardless. Shane ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
