On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:06:01 -0400, Scott Rowe <scott.r...@joann.com> wrote:
>I understand the concerns, but this sounds like a good reason for >all ISVs to review their code. ... Not just ISV; shops should review their own code, too. >My point is that there is no 100 byte limit on the interface, there >is only a limit on the implementation. >... And the good news: there is time to perform those reviews. Regardless of how much we yammer here about long parm support in JCL, IBM is not likely to implement it for a while. And unless we decide what we want and put it in a formal requirement, it's not likely to happen at all. (And I'm using that "we" a bit broadly, of course, since I won't be part of it.) Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
