On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 10:31:08 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote: >>> >>Isn't there a JES or INTRDR exit (discussed here long ago) that >>should be preferred to the SUBMIT exit because it traps all >>jobs, not just those SUBmitted by TSO. (Nowadays FTP "QUOTE SITE >>FILE=JES" provides another bypass.) >---------------------------------------<unsnip>--------------------------------------------- >Yes, a JES2 exit might have been used, but we felt that a SUBMIT exit >was easier and equally effective, since our users had no other mechanism >(we thought) to submit a job. We hadn't thought of them using IEBGENER >to INTRDR; most of them weren't that bright. :-) > I.e. they got caught.
But since I don't believe in Security through Obscurity, I'll cheerfully share with anyone who asks my EDIT macro to copy from the ISPF buffer directly to INTRDR. It: o Bypasses the the SUBMIT exit (but that wasn't its motivation). o Uses no temp data set, therefore avoids SPACE abends. o Uses (by default) the attributes of the file being edited, rather than forcing F80. >---------------------------------<unsnip>------------------------------------------------ >Apperantly. He's selling used cars now. When he asked us for a > Something's poetic about that. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
