P S wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Chuck Arney <car...@illustro.com> wrote:
Did you ever hear of FLEX-ES? They provided a 64-bit machine that IBM
would not let them license to production installations. They could
license it to developers until IBM decided to not license the patents to
them, so even the developers were cut off.
Sure, but FLEX-ES was fallout from PSI. See
http://www.google.com/url?q=http://zjournal.tcipubs.com/issues/zJ.DEC-JAN09.pdf&ei=m1bOSoPZJaW_twfGzeTzAw&sa=X&oi=spellmeleon_result&resnum=2&ct=result&usg=AFQjCNHRdgrZ_MV2LtveLUqiF5VtJV2dtA
and http://www.zjournal.com/index.cfm?section=article&aid=773
Yup. And, IBM was the "bad guy" in both cases.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
