> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jon Brock
> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 10:55 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Consequences of lowering SQA spec
> 
> 
> We are trying to fix a problem that one of our CICS regions 
> has with going short-on-storage below the 16MB line.  (In the 
> UDSA and CDSA pools, to be exact.)  As part of this effort, I 
> am trying to expand the size of our private area.  (Insert 
> your Viagra joke here.)  At the moment, we have a private 
> area of 11240K, which seems pretty good to me, but I am 
> considering lowering our current specification of SQA in 
> IEASYSxx from 10 to 6.  
> 
> Our system seems to be maxing out at using about 36% of the 
> space currently allocated.  What I need to know is what sort 
> of problems I could be letting myself in for if I lower the 
> SQA allocation too much.  Will I be up for a week and then 
> start having mysterious file problems or some such?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jon

Uh, how about the possibility of a hard wait code 101? This is reIPL
time because you are DEADBEEF.


--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology

This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and its'
content is protected by law.  If you are not the intended recipient, you
should delete this message and are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this transmission, or taking any action
based on it, is strictly prohibited.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to