On 2009-12-02 at 12:14 concerning "Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become non-dispatchable?", John Chase <[email protected]> wrote to IBM-Main :
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Scott > > [snip] why [snip] bypass normal CICS storage services [snip] sounds > > very much like a case of "Doctor, it hurts when I do this..." > The original request was for experiences / advice on using 64-bit > storage "directly" in CICS, but CICS doesn't support that (yet). That > eventually led to this thread. "Yet" being 2007 (or 2004). CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Release Guide Version 3 Release 2 (© Copyright IBM Corp. 2007) : Chapter 19. Storage management above the 2GB boundary CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Release Guide Version 3 Release 1 (© Copyright IBM Corp. 2004, 2008) : Chapter 18. 64-Bit Addressing Toleration changes I could find nothing in CICS Transaction Server for z/OS Release Guide Version 2 Release 3. ----------> signature = 6 lines follows <-------------- Neil Duffee, Joe SysProg, U d'Ottawa, Ottawa, Ont, Canada telephone:1 613 562 5800 x4585 fax:1 613 562 5161 mailto:NDuffee of uOttawa.ca http:/ /aix1.uottawa.ca/ ~nduffee "How *do* you plan for something like that?" Guardian Bob, Reboot "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism." "Systems Programming: Guilty, until proven innocent" John Norgauer 2004 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
