I am curious as to why the developer wants to bypass normal CICS storage services (which probably is just a case of compare-and-swapping a chunk on some sort of SM domain queue)
This sounds very much like a case of "Doctor, it hurts when I do this ..." Rob Scott Developer Rocket Software 275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA Tel: +1.617.614.2305 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rocketsoftware.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe Sent: 02 December 2009 16:48 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: question on STORAGE function - TCB may become non-dispatchable? Bill Fairchild wrote: > A debugging investigator made wary by previous encounters with Dr. Murphy > should assume that any hypothetically possible situation will occur, and > especially if the consequences are the most severe. So the TCB occasionally > is being suspended because the local lock is not available. > That's a good point, Bill. Local lock suspension is a possibility. I should have thought of that. :-( -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 [email protected] http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
