Yeah - I sorta thought that was obvious :-)
Rob Scott Developer Rocket Software 275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA Tel: +1.617.614.2305 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rocketsoftware.com -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen Sent: 18 December 2009 10:14 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C But it has to be HOME addressable to the waiting task. On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:05:34 -0500 Rob Scott <[email protected]> wrote: :>Joe :> :>This is no such restriction about which TCB owns the storage of an ECB, in fact it is quite common for ECBs to be "owned" by other TCBs rather than the "waiter" TCB. :> :> :>Rob Scott :>Developer :>Rocket Software :>275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA :>Tel: +1.617.614.2305 :>Email: [email protected] :>Web: www.rocketsoftware.com :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman :>Sent: 17 December 2009 23:32 :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C :> :>I declared FULL WORD in WS sp=0 :> :>And its pointer to an area in CSA and it worked the POST :>WS_SP0_PRIVATE :> :>LA RX,WS_SP0_PRIVATE :>ST RX,CSA_SP241 :> :> :> :> In posted program :> :> L RX,CSA_SP241 :> L RX,0(,RX) :> L RY,ASCB :> :> Post (RX),ASCB=(RY),ERRET=XXXX,ECBKEY=8 :> :> :> And waiting program gets posted :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob Scott :>Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 2:16 PM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C :> :>>The ECB storage has to have been obtained from the TCB where the wait :>>is :>taking place :> :>Why do you think this? :> :> :>Rob Scott :>Developer :>Rocket Software :>275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA :>Tel: +1.617.614.2305 :>Email: [email protected] :>Web: www.rocketsoftware.com :> :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joe Reichman :>Sent: 17 December 2009 18:13 :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: SYSTEM COMPLETION CODE=102 REASON CODE=0000000C :> :>The ECB storage has to have been obtained from the TCB where the wait is taking place :> :>Sent from my iPhone :> :>On Dec 17, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Peter Relson <[email protected]> wrote: :> :>> You issued cross-memory post. :>> The system was able to gain access synchronously to the target space. :>> An attempt to reference or update the ECB using the supplied key :>> failed. :>> :>> What did you mean by :>> "As the message in the DUMP following is PRIMARY NOT EQUAL TO HOME"? :>> :>> POST could not care less if an ECB is in private, CSA, or SQA as along :>> as it is addressable from the target space. Similarly, it does not :>> care what the key is, as long as the key you tell it to use works. :>> :>> I would guess that if the ECB truly was in CSA, that it was not key 8. -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
