>From my experience I'd avoid to define a uni-processor LPAR. Take at least 2 processors for a LPAR, even the ratio goes over 2.5.
Werner Kuehnel IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu> schrieb am 03.02.2010 18:59:00: > Yes, it is not a good idea to assign all of your CPs (physical > processors) to all of your LPARs. What you are doing is having all the > LPARs competing for the CPs on an equal basis. The weights take effect > only when the total CEC is 100% busy or at least very close to it. > Also, the recommendation is that the number of logical processors (LPs) > not be more than 2.5 times the number of CPs. Even in your original > configuration you have have a ratio of 11 LPs to 3 CPs. That is quite > high. > Tom Kelman ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
