You do know that  6 x 9 = 42, works correctly in base 13 math.

Hayim
_____________________________________
Hayim Sokolsky, CISSP
    Mainframe Security Architect
    DTCC Corporate Information Security
    18301 Bermuda Green Dr, MS 1-CIS
    Tampa FL 33647-1760

    Tel. (813) 470-2177



Arthur Gutowski <[email protected]> 
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>
2010.02.12 11:27
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]>


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
Re: GDPS Distance Impact on Sysplex Response Time






On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:03:33 -0600, Martin Kline <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>We have a sysplex with four processors, two of which run production work
>with development work on the others. In their quest for trivia, my
>management wants to know the impact to production if we move the
>development processors to a second site, leaving the coupling facilities, 

>DASD, VTS and primary network all on one site.
...
>And, just to make this interesting, they want an answer tomorrow. 
Actually
>they would like it yesterday, but tomorrow will have to do. I've been 
reading
>several manuals, and I think the answer they should get is 42.
...
42 seems like the right answer to me.  Particularly if the question is, 
"What do 
you get when you multiply 6 by 9?"

Such a move has no effect on licensing costs if you indeed preserve the 
current sysplex configuration.  If you are currently under Sysplex 
Aggregate 
pricing, it will remain regardless of how far apart the DC's are. Hardware 
costs 
are another matter.

Since the PHBs want to move development and leave production alone, the 
impact I see is latency to the CFs impacting common structures - ISGLOCK, 
SYSIGGCAS_ECS, Operlog, Logrec, and any IXC structures, provided none of 
your development DB2/CICS/IMS are datasharing with production regions. 

The dumb question of the day is, what's the point?  Unless they need the 
floor 
space, are phasing a dc relocation, or want to eventually build a 
quasi-GDPS 
(which means moving / mirroring tape, DASD, CFs, etc.), this is a costly 
exercise in futility.  I'm just sayin'...

Art Gutowski
Ford Motor Company

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html



<BR>_____________________________________________________________
<FONT size=2><BR>
DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or
entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any
attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses.  The company
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted
by this email.</FONT>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to