I don't see that the extremely unlikely case of a customer subject to a non-disclosure agreement releasing integrity APAR documentation is going to dissuade any customer from reporting an integrity exposure.
I do expect that the customer's legal department is likely to be far more of a deterrent to any unauthorized disclosure, since the disclosure could be very costly in terms of their relationship with IBM. John P. Baker -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2010 11:37 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Integrity APAR Documentation What is the risk factor? Would users be as willing to report integrity problems if they knew that the data might be shared with other customers? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
