Ron,
 
I saw your post and I would like to try out your suggestion.  You say that the 
dsns is compressed at the Primary level and using a  Management class it is 
migrated to Ml2 directly.  What software do you use to compress the data on the 
Primary level?

--- On Wed, 4/21/10, Ron Hawkins <ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


From: Ron Hawkins <ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Received: Wednesday, April 21, 2010, 10:31 AM


Oops. That should say " It is why one typically gives compressed datasets a
management class that bypasses a period on ML1 and sends them to ML2."

> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
> Ron Hawkins
> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:26 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2
> 
> Esmie,
> 
> If you choose to compress them then they are compressed. This is the
common
> practice. Ml1 is often the same media as Primary, so compression is where
> one would save space and cost with ML1. It is why one typically gives
> compressed datasets a management class that bypasses a period on primary
and
> sends them to ML2.
> 
> Many sites choose to have ML2 uncompressed as this is already performed by
> the tape media, just like you would with DFSMSdss. This saves CPU, but
means
> the channels are busier. The saving for ML2 is archiving the datasets on
> media with a cheaper TCO.
> 
> If you move ML2 to disk you should look at whether compression has to be
> enabled again and figure that into your current CPU profile.
> 
> If you were to go with an ML1 only strategy or simply use ML2 Disk, I
would
> suggest investigating the potential savings of using internal SATA drives,
> or if you are using HDS USP or USP-V look at using virtualized midrange
> storage - HDS or non-HDS midrange. Depending on when you run primary and
> secondary space management, there may be the potential to figure some CPU
> capacity savings by using cheaper disk media, leaving compression off for
> ML2, and turning it off for ML1.
> 
> Ron
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of
> > esmie moo
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 5:45 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> > Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2
> >
> > Ron,
> >
> > You mentioned compression.  Please correct me if I am wrong.  All the
dsns
> on
> > ML1 are  compressed?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --- On Tue, 4/20/10, Ron Hawkins <ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: Ron Hawkins <ron.hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net>
> > Subject: Re: DFHSM QUESTION - MOVING TO DASD FROM TAPE - ML2
> > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> > Received: Tuesday, April 20, 2010, 12:46 PM
> >
> >
> > Darth,
> >
> > The ML1 and ML2 are usually cheaper and lower performance than Primary
> > Storage. ML1 cost efficiency is usually achieved through compression,
> > whereas ML2 is a change in media.
> >
> > ML2 Tape can easily be replaced with Tier 2 disk using internal SATA,
> > external virtualized midrange storage, or earlier generations of DASD
disk
> > systems with a reduced maintenance cost (I think Radoslaw did this with
> > 7700E).
> >
> > Ron
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > If I understand this correctly, you're going to have 2 levels of
> migration
> > > both on Disk?  Even if that's possible, what does it gain you? 
Wouldn't
> > > it make more sense to just have an ML1 and then no ML2? And again, I
> > > question whether that's even possible with HSM.
> > >
> > > I do seem to remember this same discussion in the past, so you should
> > > probably check out the archives.  We're actually going the other route
-
> > > we're moving to a 'tapeless' virtual tape system & I'm eliminating
ML1.
> > >
> > > ddk
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
> Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html




----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to