In <a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea005c021b...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom>,
on 05/08/2010
at 07:11 AM, "McKown, John" <john.mck...@healthmarkets.com> said:
>Not any from IBM that I am aware of. IBM's method implys a "stack" of
>GDGs,
There is no "IBM's method", only IBM's method*s*; as Larry Wall
claims, TMTOWTDI. In particular, you can read the catalog, extract the
GDS names and process them individually. You can even maintain a
record of what you've done with which.
>There is not an IBM way to process them from oldest to youngest.
Sure there is; use, e.g., CSI, then allocate each GDS that is of
interest and do what you want with it. If you're writing in Perl, use
file globs.
>you could do it with their "catsearch" program.
Is that a wrapper for CSI?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
