Probably from dataset names like 'FOOLISHLY.BARRED', which can't be
effectively processed by CVOL management routines.
Rick
----------------------------------------------------
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2010 20:27:33 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Strange rule; I wonder what motivated it?
CVOL.
The thread, which you trimmed excessively, as is your bad custom,
concerned, for example, why, when the programmer codes:
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=(,CATLG),DSN=FOO.BAR
... the data set is catalogued, whereas for:
//SYSUT2 DD DISP=(,CATLG),DSN='FOO.BAR'
... the JCL C/I changes the disposition to KEEP. In both cases,
identical data set names are created. In each case the name was
acceptable to CVOL. Why should the C/I make the distinction?
CVOL can't be the explanation. Cui bono?
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
